ࡱ> IH1( b/ 0DTimes New Romantt,` 0DArialNew Romantt,` 0 A . @n?" dd@  @@`` 0e6   ?OVWX 0AA@g4fdfdd 0jppp@  ʚ;ʚ;<4dddd@ x 0@<4KdKd@ x 0@r0___PPT10 pp2___PPT9/ 0?($  J. LangeO =*Autonomy and Accountability  New Models of Institutional Autonomy"CB  ":  Presentation to the International Seminar  The University of the 21st Century  Emerging Models of Independence Novi Sad, 28 - 30 October 2005 Dr. Josef Lange, State Secretary, Ministry for Science and Culture of Lower Saxony, Hannover, Germany&    Challenges by Changes    Expansion of the higher education sector for more than one third of an age-group:  democratisation of higher education Internationalisation of economy and science:  globalisation Development of science based society:  knowledge economy Competition for reputation, persons and funds Speed of change and innovations: science (research and development), organization, fundingxZx x   Challenges for Universities ,   FCompetition (regional, national, international): reputation scientists, young researchers, students:  brain gain/ circulation funding for research and teaching basic funding (on federal state s level) Concentration (staff and resources) on strengths by setting priorities and posteriorities Cooperation in all fields: strategic alliances Corporate identity in tension between individual and institutional autonomy L2ZZZZ&  ~  ) Challenges for Universities require (1) **  * Concepts and strategic planning: diversification according to different expectations of students labour market science (R & D) HEI s stakeholders (= society,state, foundation, members, etc.) Connecting universities and society: responsibility, accountability, periodic reporting to government, parliament, the public :Yi?H      ) Challenges for Universities require (2) ** ) presponsibility and accountability of universities for students (and their lifetime) quality of research, teaching and degrees public funds = taxpayers money: effectivity and efficiency individual freedom of research and teaching development of knowledge and science problem-defining and -solving for society N77.    6JUniversities need autonomy in  KSelecting and admitting students Hiring staff Financing from different sources: State, research funds, teaching funds = fees, private income (donations, own companies, etc.) Internal distribution of funding according to profiles and performance Organizing their internal structure according to different needs and expectations 6IKK 7KUniversities need   Distance to the State: due to the speed of change in higher education and research politics and administration cannot organize science in an apropriate way Different models of autonomy according to the different legal, social and financial situation in various countries: individual solutions for countries and universities Diversification according to role and mission Setting priorities and posteriorities coordinated with other universities within the State@     6 JTasks of Modern States concerning Universities in State Responsibility (1)&KJ  K HE as a public good in public responsibility - ministry as a  holding of State-universities Providing legal structures: - organisation follows tasks: individual solutions for universities, ensuring a common framework - personal responsibility and accountability: definition and differentiation of functions - advice, decision, control; - tension between professional management / leadership and academic participation ( demo-cracy in university)&yZKZ.   JTasks of Modern States concerning Universities in State Responsibility (2)&KJ  K Providing resources, reliable for several years, according to - role and mission - performance in student / graduate numbers - differentiated to disciplines, research and develop-ment (incl. education & training of young acad.) - effectivity and efficiency of using funds - contract management between State and universities on several years Setting rules for university income from private sources2>PP9P@  0    .C2Quality Assurance of Higher Education Institutions$32   3 Regulation Quality of Allocation of resources contents, organi- Standards sation, results, Controlling processes Transparency - Consulting - Competition Evaluation/Accreditation "S@>    y !3" University of the future (1) ##  # Improvement of quality and performance by competition: Individual profile through differenciation: adaptable struktures for persons - strategic planning for innovation and networking: internally, other universities, research institutes, companies, society Framework for technical, social, institutional, mental innovations: science =  expectation of the unexpected ,7Z8$Zo@R       " The University of the future (2) &#"  # develop an individual profile by institutional diver-sification and strategic cooperation work in and be organised for interdisciplinary groups - based on solid specialisation be open-minded for international and intercultu-ral cooperation and regard its local responsibility integrate information and communication tech-nology, supporting not substituting the campus develop and defend institutional autonomy and corporate identity to guarantee individual freedom   b; ;  < 7Z5     ^   8L ! Thank you for your attention!2$,    0` ̙33` ` ff3333f` 333MMM` f` f` 3>?" dd@,|?" dd@   " @ ` n?" dd@   @@``PR    @ ` ` p>> OG(    6* P  a-Klicken Sie, um das Titelformat zu bearbeiten. .4  0|5   pKlicken Sie, um die Formate des Vorlagentextes zu bearbeiten Zweite Ebene Dritte Ebene Vierte Ebene Fnfte Ebene=     q  0T; ``  X*  0? `   Z*  04[ `   Z*H  0޽h ? ̙33 Standarddesign 0 0,((  , , 0u P    P*   , 0z     R*  d , c $ ?  4 , 0}  @  pKlicken Sie, um die Formate des Vorlagentextes zu bearbeiten Zweite Ebene Dritte Ebene Vierte Ebene Fnfte Ebene=     q , 6`e `P   P*   , 6` `   R*  H , 0޽h ? ̙3380___PPT10.KL 0 @(  l  C GZ G l  C GPYY G H  0޽h ? ̙33$  0 p$(  pr p S >G  G r p S t?Gz G H p 0޽h ? ̙3380___PPT10.L#  0 $$(  $r $ S KG  G r $ S `OG` G H $ 0޽h ? ̙33  0  $( Dgq  r  S $aG`@  G r  S aG G H  0޽h ? ̙33$  0  t$(  tr t S DoGTY  G r t S pG G H t 0޽h ? ̙3380___PPT10.y.$  0 `$(  r  S $G  G r  S GTY G H  0޽h ? ̙3380___PPT10.ZhF$  0 p$(  r  S ėGw  G r  S G' G H  0޽h ? ̙3380___PPT10.3z  0 L$(  Lr L S G  G r L S |G0 G H L 0޽h ? ̙33  0 P$(  Pr P S \G`  G r P S 4G` G H P 0޽h ? ̙33?  0 f^h(  h~ h s *`G   G x h c $8G' G ^ h 6o3  Rb h s *  H h 0޽h ? ̙33y___PPT10Y+D=' = @B +  0 NF((  (x ( c $Q'   x ( c $Q   ( 6TSz@ @ "0 H ( 0޽h ? ̙33  0  $(  z  r  S ``   r  S ܌  H  0޽h ? ̙33  0 (  r  S X[  H  0޽h ? ̙3380___PPT10.7r`01@X 0DF: -OQ BH!LV.S60JMZ\81Oh+'0, `h  (Universities as Knowledge EnterprisesJosefantic34Microsoft PowerPoint@D@@qe@<嫳WGg  R  y--$xx--'@Arial-. 12 Autonomy and Accountability ."System7-@Arial-.  2 z.-@Arial-.  2 New .-@Arial-. +2 Models of Institutional .-@Arial-. 2 fAutonomy.-@Arial-. F2 ;*Presentation to the International Seminar .-@Arial-.  2 ;.-@Arial-.  2 ;The .-@Arial-. 62 CUniversity of the 21st Century .-@Arial-.  2 Cl.-@Arial-. 2 Cq Emerging .-@Arial-. (2 J0Models of Independence.-@Arial-.  2 Js.-@Arial-. 2 S' Novi Sad, 28 .-@Arial-.  2 SL-.-@Arial-. 2 SP30 October 2005.-@Arial-. 2 \<Dr. Josef Lange,.-@Arial-. R2 d2State Secretary, Ministry for Science and Culture .-@Arial-. !2 kof Lower Saxony, d.-@Arial-. 2 kOHannover.-@Arial-. 2 kj , Germany .-՜.+,0    On-screen Show ]S  Times New RomanArialStandarddesignCAutonomy and Accountability New Models of Institutional AutonomyChallenges by Changes  Challenges for Universities * Challenges for Universities require (1) * Challenges for Universities require (2) Universities need autonomy inUniversities need KTasks of Modern States concerning Universities in State Responsibility (1)KTasks of Modern States concerning Universities in State Responsibility (2)3Quality Assurance of Higher Education Institutions# University of the future (1) # The University of the future (2) Slide 13  Fonts UsedDesign Template Slide Titles _\anticantic  !"#$%&'()*+,-.012345679:;<=>?ABCDEFGJRoot EntrydO)Current User@SummaryInformation(/\PowerPoint Document(]DocumentSummaryInformation88